Virginia Tech Hokies at Clemson Tigers college football matchup
- Kickoff
- Sat, Oct 24
- Time TBA
- Venue
- Clemson home
- Memorial Stadium (Clemson, SC)
- Captured market
- Line not posted
- No verified spread
- Player model
- 21 players
- preseason · cfb-fantasy-quantile-2026.1
Virginia Tech visits Clemson in Week 8.
Virginia Tech travels to Clemson at Memorial Stadium (Clemson, SC). No sourced spread is attached to this game yet, so the page does not infer a favorite.
The published player model covers 21 featured skill players in this matchup. Its highest median fantasy forecasts belong to Bill Davis (VT), Ethan Grunkemeyer (VT), and Bryant Wesco Jr. (CLEM).
Market pending
There is no verified spread for this matchup in the committed snapshot.
Player projection coverage
21 player distributions are available, led by Bill Davis (VT).
Venue context
Clemson is the designated home team at Memorial Stadium (Clemson, SC).
cfb-fantasy-quantile-2026.1 · preseason
As of 2026-08-13T21:35:14+00:00No favorite inferred
context onlyPreseason model
As of 2026-08-13T21:35:14+00:00Unit ledger
Every bar rewards the better low-number rank, while exact values stay visible for both teams.
Unit edges from the 2025 charting
Offense units paired against the defense units they will face, from snap-weighted 2025 PFF grades, national ranks, and returning-snap shares. Historical form, never a game prediction.
Each offense unit paired against the defense unit it will actually face, using 2025 snap-weighted PFF grades and national ranks, with returning-snap caveats where an edge rests on departed players. Measured history, not a game prediction.
Virginia Tech pass protection vs Clemson pass rush
Virginia Tech's pass protection graded 52.6 in 2025 (129th of 136); Clemson's pass rush graded 67.7 (46th). On 2025 form that is a clear edge for Clemson's pass rush.
Clemson pass protection vs Virginia Tech pass rush
Clemson's pass protection graded 65.3 in 2025 (75th of 136); Virginia Tech's pass rush graded 68.4 (32nd). On 2025 form that is a clear edge for Virginia Tech's pass rush.
Virginia Tech receiving corps vs Clemson coverage
Virginia Tech's receiving corps graded 60.3 in 2025 (122nd of 136); Clemson's coverage graded 67.2 (35th). On 2025 form that is a clear edge for Clemson's coverage.
Clemson receiving corps vs Virginia Tech coverage
Clemson's receiving corps graded 63.5 in 2025 (83rd of 136); Virginia Tech's coverage graded 58.5 (121st). On 2025 form that is a modest edge for Clemson's receiving corps.
Virginia Tech rush offense vs Clemson run defense
Virginia Tech's rush offense graded 78.9 in 2025 (33rd of 136); Clemson's run defense graded 69.6 (40th). On 2025 form this pairing is effectively a push.
Clemson rush offense vs Virginia Tech run defense
Clemson's rush offense graded 72.3 in 2025 (102nd of 136); Virginia Tech's run defense graded 66.8 (68th). On 2025 form that is a modest edge for Virginia Tech's run defense.
Where the player model concentrates
The two highest median model players for each side. Context-only prior and baseline rows are excluded.
League projected stat lines
Means and 20th–80th percentile ranges for every published model player; missing stats stay missing.
Virginia Tech
12 League projections| Player | Pos | Fantasy pts | Pass yds | Rush yds | Receptions | Rec yds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bill DavisVOLATILE · Tier 5 | RB | 13.65.2–21.8 | — | 6721–94 | 2.00.9–3.4 | 160–22 |
| Ethan GrunkemeyerSAFE FLOOR · Tier 6 | QB | 12.83.8–21.7 | 19379–248 | — | — | — |
| Ayden Greenebalanced · Tier 5 | WR | 10.43.4–15.6 | — | — | 3.41.0–4.7 | 4915–70 |
| Marcellous HawkinsELITE · Tier 6 | RB | 9.13.0–15.3 | — | 5011–80 | — | — |
| Que'Sean Brownbalanced · Tier 5 | WR | 8.62.7–12.5 | — | — | 3.51.0–5.6 | 4110–58 |
| Jeffrey Overton Jr.VOLATILE · Tier 6 | RB | 8.02.0–12.6 | — | 3711–62 | — | — |
| Takye HeathSAFE FLOOR · Tier 5 | WR | 8.62.5–13.9 | — | — | 3.31.0–5.4 | — |
| Shamarius PeterkinSAFE FLOOR · Tier 5 | WR | 7.22.2–11.9 | — | — | — | 3610–53 |
| Ja'Ricous Hairstonbalanced · Tier 6 | TE | 7.02.0–10.8 | — | — | 2.41.0–3.7 | — |
| Benji GosnellHIGH CEILING · Tier 6 | TE | 7.42.2–11.1 | — | — | 2.81.0–3.8 | — |
| Tyseer DenmarkHIGH CEILING · Tier 5 | WR | 6.01.5–10.2 | — | — | — | — |
| Tyler Masonbalanced · Tier 6 | RB | 5.51.1–10.2 | — | — | — | — |
Clemson
9 League projections| Player | Pos | Fantasy pts | Pass yds | Rush yds | Receptions | Rec yds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bryant Wesco Jr.SAFE FLOOR · Tier 5 | WR | 13.65.2–22.4 | — | — | 4.41.0–6.4 | 5923–84 |
| T.J. Moorebalanced · Tier 5 | WR | 13.84.2–20.9 | — | — | 4.11.0–5.6 | 5717–81 |
| Christopher VizzinaHIGH CEILING · Tier 6 | QB | 11.82.6–22.3 | 16254–247 | — | — | — |
| Tristan SmithVOLATILE · Tier 5 | WR | 9.72.8–15.2 | — | — | 3.21.0–5.0 | 3713–57 |
| Chris Johnson Jr.SAFE FLOOR · Tier 6 | RB | 8.92.8–14.8 | — | 4216–60 | — | — |
| Christian BentancurHIGH CEILING · Tier 6 | TE | 8.22.4–13.4 | — | — | 2.71.0–4.1 | 3010–44 |
| Gideon Davidsonbalanced · Tier 6 | RB | 6.81.9–11.7 | — | 336–54 | — | — |
| Cole TurnerHIGH CEILING · Tier 5 | WR | 7.12.1–11.2 | — | — | 2.71.0–3.7 | 338–45 |
| Olsen Patt-HenryELITE · Tier 6 | TE | 6.91.9–10.9 | — | — | 2.61.0–3.9 | 308–43 |
Virginia Tech
- Rush yds
- 67
- Receptions
- 2.0
- Rec yds
- 16
- Pass yds
- 193
- Receptions
- 3.4
- Rec yds
- 49
- Rush yds
- 50
- Receptions
- 3.5
- Rec yds
- 41
- Rush yds
- 37
- Receptions
- 3.3
- Rec yds
- 36
- Receptions
- 2.4
- Receptions
- 2.8
Clemson
- Receptions
- 4.4
- Rec yds
- 59
- Receptions
- 4.1
- Rec yds
- 57
- Pass yds
- 162
- Receptions
- 3.2
- Rec yds
- 37
- Rush yds
- 42
- Receptions
- 2.7
- Rec yds
- 30
- Rush yds
- 33
- Receptions
- 2.7
- Rec yds
- 33
- Receptions
- 2.6
- Rec yds
- 30
The League does not publish a game-side, total, or moneyline prediction without a validated game-market model.
Generated Aug 13, 5:35 PM EDT · collegefootballdata · Player outcomes are ranges, not guarantees. No game-side, total, or moneyline prediction is inferred.
Props to compare after a line posts
Model ranges are not recommendations. No player-prop line or price is captured in this artifact.
| Player | Market | Projection | Median | 20th–80th | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bill DavisRB · VT | Rushing yards | 67.3 | 54.3 | 21.4–93.7 | Shop the line |
| Ethan GrunkemeyerQB · VT | Passing yards | 193.1 | 205.5 | 78.6–247.7 | Shop the line |
| Bryant Wesco Jr.WR · CLEM | Receiving yards | 58.9 | 47.4 | 23.1–84.3 | Shop the line |
| T.J. MooreWR · CLEM | Receiving yards | 56.7 | 40.5 | 17.1–80.9 | Shop the line |
| Christopher VizzinaQB · CLEM | Passing yards | 161.9 | 178.1 | 54.1–246.7 | Shop the line |
| Ayden GreeneWR · VT | Receiving yards | 49.1 | 37.4 | 14.7–70.2 | Shop the line |
Rushing yards
- Projection
- 67.3
- Median
- 54.3
- 20th–80th
- 21.4–93.7
- Status
- Shop the line
No captured player-prop line. Compare the model range only after a market posts.
Passing yards
- Projection
- 193.1
- Median
- 205.5
- 20th–80th
- 78.6–247.7
- Status
- Shop the line
No captured player-prop line. Compare the model range only after a market posts.
Receiving yards
- Projection
- 58.9
- Median
- 47.4
- 20th–80th
- 23.1–84.3
- Status
- Shop the line
No captured player-prop line. Compare the model range only after a market posts.
Receiving yards
- Projection
- 56.7
- Median
- 40.5
- 20th–80th
- 17.1–80.9
- Status
- Shop the line
No captured player-prop line. Compare the model range only after a market posts.
Passing yards
- Projection
- 161.9
- Median
- 178.1
- 20th–80th
- 54.1–246.7
- Status
- Shop the line
No captured player-prop line. Compare the model range only after a market posts.
Receiving yards
- Projection
- 49.1
- Median
- 37.4
- 20th–80th
- 14.7–70.2
- Status
- Shop the line
No captured player-prop line. Compare the model range only after a market posts.
Methodology and data boundary
Schedule and venue facts come from the committed ESPN 2026 catalog. Spreads are dated market snapshots, prioritizing DraftKings where available. Player stat lines and fantasy ranges come only from the versioned weekly CFB quantile model; prior and baseline context do not enter this page. Missing data stays missing.
- Line snapshot
- No line
- Model update
- Aug 13, 5:35 PM EDT
- Game prediction
- Not validated