Central Michigan Chippewas at Eastern Michigan Eagles college football matchup
- Kickoff
- Wed, Nov 4
- Time TBA
- Venue
- Neutral site
- Ford Field
- Captured market
- Line not posted
- No verified spread
- Player model
- 16 players
- preseason · cfb-fantasy-quantile-2026.1
Eastern Michigan and Central Michigan open on a neutral stage.
Eastern Michigan and Central Michigan meet on a neutral stage at Ford Field. No sourced spread is attached to this game yet, so the page does not infer a favorite.
The published player model covers 16 featured skill players in this matchup. Its highest median fantasy forecasts belong to Noah Kim (EMU), Angel Flores (CMU), and Langston Lewis (CMU).
Market pending
There is no verified spread for this matchup in the committed snapshot.
Player projection coverage
16 player distributions are available, led by Noah Kim (EMU).
Neutral-site context
Ford Field removes the standard home-field assumption.
cfb-fantasy-quantile-2026.1 · preseason
As of 2026-08-13T21:35:20+00:00No favorite inferred
context onlyPreseason model
As of 2026-08-13T21:35:20+00:00Unit ledger
Every bar rewards the better low-number rank, while exact values stay visible for both teams.
Unit edges from the 2025 charting
Offense units paired against the defense units they will face, from snap-weighted 2025 PFF grades, national ranks, and returning-snap shares. Historical form, never a game prediction.
Each offense unit paired against the defense unit it will actually face, using 2025 snap-weighted PFF grades and national ranks, with returning-snap caveats where an edge rests on departed players. Measured history, not a game prediction.
Central Michigan pass protection vs Eastern Michigan pass rush
Central Michigan's pass protection graded 46.1 in 2025 (134th of 136); Eastern Michigan's pass rush graded 62.0 (112th). On 2025 form that is a modest edge for Eastern Michigan's pass rush.
Eastern Michigan pass protection vs Central Michigan pass rush
Eastern Michigan's pass protection graded 64.1 in 2025 (85th of 136); Central Michigan's pass rush graded 67.5 (49th). On 2025 form that is a modest edge for Central Michigan's pass rush.
Central Michigan receiving corps vs Eastern Michigan coverage
Central Michigan's receiving corps graded 67.0 in 2025 (28th of 136); Eastern Michigan's coverage graded 59.6 (114th). On 2025 form that is a clear edge for Central Michigan's receiving corps.
Eastern Michigan receiving corps vs Central Michigan coverage
Eastern Michigan's receiving corps graded 64.3 in 2025 (73rd of 136); Central Michigan's coverage graded 66.9 (40th). On 2025 form that is a modest edge for Central Michigan's coverage. Central Michigan's coverage returns only 19.0% of those snaps, so the edge rests on departed production.
Central Michigan rush offense vs Eastern Michigan run defense
Central Michigan's rush offense graded 73.1 in 2025 (92nd of 136); Eastern Michigan's run defense graded 60.8 (132nd). On 2025 form that is a clear edge for Central Michigan's rush offense.
Eastern Michigan rush offense vs Central Michigan run defense
Eastern Michigan's rush offense graded 74.0 in 2025 (84th of 136); Central Michigan's run defense graded 65.0 (94th). On 2025 form this pairing is effectively a push. Both units return under a quarter of their 2025 snaps, so last season's form carries less weight here.
Where the player model concentrates
The two highest median model players for each side. Context-only prior and baseline rows are excluded.
League projected stat lines
Means and 20th–80th percentile ranges for every published model player; missing stats stay missing.
Central Michigan
9 League projections| Player | Pos | Fantasy pts | Pass yds | Rush yds | Receptions | Rec yds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angel FloresHIGH CEILING · Tier 5 | QB | 14.64.1–24.1 | — | 509–81 | — | — |
| Langston Lewisbalanced · Tier 5 | WR | 12.94.1–20.5 | — | — | 3.81.1–5.7 | 5516–82 |
| Brock TownsendHIGH CEILING · Tier 6 | RB | 11.53.3–19.1 | — | 388–63 | — | — |
| Tommy McIntoshSAFE FLOOR · Tier 5 | WR | 10.43.3–15.5 | — | — | 3.31.0–5.3 | 4314–65 |
| Jadyn GlasserHIGH CEILING · Tier 6 | QB | 8.71.2–17.6 | — | — | — | — |
| Vaughn Bluebalanced · Tier 6 | RB | 8.72.1–14.3 | — | — | — | 140–21 |
| Marcus BeamonSAFE FLOOR · Tier 6 | QB | 7.21.0–11.7 | — | 311–53 | — | — |
| Nasir WilliamsSAFE FLOOR · Tier 5 | WR | 6.32.0–10.2 | — | — | — | 278–44 |
| Collin Paynebalanced · Tier 5 | WR | 6.81.8–10.4 | — | — | — | 339–48 |
Eastern Michigan
7 League projections| Player | Pos | Fantasy pts | Pass yds | Rush yds | Receptions | Rec yds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noah KimVOLATILE · Tier 4 | QB | 17.76.8–25.7 | 230148–279 | — | — | — |
| Nick DevereauxELITE · Tier 5 | WR | 11.63.7–19.3 | — | — | 3.31.0–5.0 | 5015–69 |
| Harold MackSAFE FLOOR · Tier 5 | WR | 10.43.4–18.8 | — | — | 3.71.0–5.5 | 5014–77 |
| Braydon BennettHIGH CEILING · Tier 6 | RB | 11.62.8–19.6 | — | 4611–69 | — | — |
| Joshua LongELITE · Tier 6 | TE | 7.62.3–11.0 | — | — | 2.91.0–4.6 | 3710–56 |
| Tanner LemasterSAFE FLOOR · Tier 6 | TE | 5.81.9–9.7 | — | — | 2.41.0–3.3 | 288–41 |
| Mekhi FoxVOLATILE · Tier 5 | WR | 5.71.6–9.4 | — | — | — | 277–38 |
Central Michigan
- Rush yds
- 50
- Receptions
- 3.8
- Rec yds
- 55
- Rush yds
- 38
- Receptions
- 3.3
- Rec yds
- 43
- Rec yds
- 14
- Rush yds
- 31
- Rec yds
- 27
- Rec yds
- 33
Eastern Michigan
- Pass yds
- 230
- Receptions
- 3.3
- Rec yds
- 50
- Receptions
- 3.7
- Rec yds
- 50
- Rush yds
- 46
- Receptions
- 2.9
- Rec yds
- 37
- Receptions
- 2.4
- Rec yds
- 28
- Rec yds
- 27
The League does not publish a game-side, total, or moneyline prediction without a validated game-market model.
Generated Aug 13, 5:35 PM EDT · collegefootballdata · Player outcomes are ranges, not guarantees. No game-side, total, or moneyline prediction is inferred.
Props to compare after a line posts
Model ranges are not recommendations. No player-prop line or price is captured in this artifact.
| Player | Market | Projection | Median | 20th–80th | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noah KimQB · EMU | Passing yards | 230.0 | 231.3 | 147.9–279.0 | Shop the line |
| Angel FloresQB · CMU | Rushing yards | 50.2 | 41.1 | 8.5–81.0 | Shop the line |
| Langston LewisWR · CMU | Receiving yards | 54.8 | 39.9 | 15.9–82.2 | Shop the line |
| Nick DevereauxWR · EMU | Receiving yards | 50.4 | 34.3 | 14.6–69.3 | Shop the line |
| Brock TownsendRB · CMU | Rushing yards | 38.0 | 30.9 | 8.0–62.6 | Shop the line |
| Harold MackWR · EMU | Receiving yards | 50.1 | 37.9 | 14.2–76.6 | Shop the line |
Passing yards
- Projection
- 230.0
- Median
- 231.3
- 20th–80th
- 147.9–279.0
- Status
- Shop the line
No captured player-prop line. Compare the model range only after a market posts.
Rushing yards
- Projection
- 50.2
- Median
- 41.1
- 20th–80th
- 8.5–81.0
- Status
- Shop the line
No captured player-prop line. Compare the model range only after a market posts.
Receiving yards
- Projection
- 54.8
- Median
- 39.9
- 20th–80th
- 15.9–82.2
- Status
- Shop the line
No captured player-prop line. Compare the model range only after a market posts.
Receiving yards
- Projection
- 50.4
- Median
- 34.3
- 20th–80th
- 14.6–69.3
- Status
- Shop the line
No captured player-prop line. Compare the model range only after a market posts.
Rushing yards
- Projection
- 38.0
- Median
- 30.9
- 20th–80th
- 8.0–62.6
- Status
- Shop the line
No captured player-prop line. Compare the model range only after a market posts.
Receiving yards
- Projection
- 50.1
- Median
- 37.9
- 20th–80th
- 14.2–76.6
- Status
- Shop the line
No captured player-prop line. Compare the model range only after a market posts.
Methodology and data boundary
Schedule and venue facts come from the committed ESPN 2026 catalog. Spreads are dated market snapshots, prioritizing DraftKings where available. Player stat lines and fantasy ranges come only from the versioned weekly CFB quantile model; prior and baseline context do not enter this page. Missing data stays missing.
- Line snapshot
- No line
- Model update
- Aug 13, 5:35 PM EDT
- Game prediction
- Not validated